Controversy

Should the US invest in high-speed rail?

WRITTEN BY
07/23/25
vs

Fact Box

  • World Population Review asserts that 42 countries have a high-speed rail system with China having the longest in operation at 40,474 kilometers and 13,063 under construction. Spain has the second-longest track, totaling about 13,000 kilometers. 
  • According to Forbes, there are a few high-speed rail projects underway in the United States, with the Acela Trains in the Northeast Corridor being the only one fully funded. Others in California, Texas, and Washington are either partially funded or lacking significant funds. 
  • The Southern Rail Commission reported that 60% of registered voters support high-speed rail networks, with only 16% in opposition as of March 2024. 
  • The cost of building high-speed rail in the United States is more expensive than in other countries such as Italy, Sweden, and Turkey. The issues that drive higher costs are wages, lack of standardization, and private stakeholder agendas.

James (Yes)

Investing in a high-speed rail system holds tremendous potential for the United States, offering a range of benefits that can reshape the country's transportation infrastructure. For example, high-speed rail systems excel in time efficiency, revolutionizing travel between cities. Passengers can reach their destinations quickly and conveniently by significantly reducing travel time. This enhanced connectivity improves personal mobility and stimulates economic productivity by facilitating faster business interactions and boosting tourism. Secondly, high-speed rail aligns with environmental sustainability goals. Compared to airplanes or cars, it is an environmentally friendly mode of transportation, producing fewer greenhouse gas emissions. By investing in high-speed rail, the US can actively contribute to a cleaner and greener future, reducing its carbon footprint and mitigating the impact of climate change.

In addition, high-speed rail plays a pivotal role in reducing congestion in urban areas. By providing an efficient alternative to road and air travel, it alleviates traffic congestion, resulting in smoother transportation networks. This, in turn, enhances overall mobility, reduces commuting stress, and improves the quality of life for residents. Furthermore, high-speed trains are designed with advanced safety features, ensuring a secure and pleasant travel experience for passengers. From robust infrastructure to stringent safety protocols, the focus on passenger safety remains paramount. Moreover, these trains provide a comfortable and smooth ride, enhancing the overall travel experience.

Finally, investing in high-speed rail is more economical in the long run. While there may be substantial upfront costs for infrastructure development, high-speed rail systems are cost-effective to operate and maintain. Over time, this investment can lead to long-term savings for both passengers and the government, making it a financially prudent choice.


Elisa (No)

While the idea of a high-speed railway system may sound exciting at first glance, Cato.org explains it would take decades to build, carry relatively few passengers, and provide no real improvements to the existing railway service. In other words, the high-speed railway system is a “pipedream”—not a feasible reality for the United States. 

First, the cost of the railway system outweighs any of its benefits, and the system would not stimulate a better economy. The endeavor is unrealistic and too expensive. Moreover, it is extremely unlikely that the United States could ever adopt this type of system, mainly because of distance and endless legal proceduralism. Again, it would be an expensive process, and this money would be better invested in improving our railway system. Quite simply, the United States is not ready for such a system. 

Another thing to consider is that Americans really do not use the railway systems as much as they do their own cars, with 75% driving their own vehicles to work. Automobile culture in the United States is like no other place in the world, and that really should be the focus of improvement in our country - not a system few will ultimately use. Cars and planes are simply more important in America when it comes to travel, and this type of transportation should be the focus of improvement efforts.

Let’s not forget that a high-speed railway system does have a greater environmental impact than a regular railroad, and the ongoing project for a high-speed rail is simply failing. When it comes to transportation in the United States, let’s not fix what isn’t broken—let’s improve what we already have in place.

  • chat-ic0
  • like-ic2
  • chart-ic9
  • share-icShare

Comments

0 / 1000